TLDR¶

• Core Points: AWS NAT Gateway charges primarily come from data processing, not the hourly rate, especially for S3 transfers and OS updates from private subnets.
• Main Content: Free Gateway VPC Endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB, Interface Endpoints for other services, and architectural changes (managed proxies or reduced outbound internet access) can dramatically lower costs.
• Key Insights: Understanding data processing charges is essential; re-architecting network access can deliver significant savings with minimal impact on security and reliability.
• Considerations: Evaluate service usage patterns, regional pricing, and potential operational changes before migrating to endpoints or proxies.
• Recommended Actions: Map current traffic to endpoints, enable free S3/DynamoDB endpoints, adopt Interface Endpoints for remaining services, and explore proxy or posture changes to minimize outbound internet exposure.

Content Overview¶

Cloud networking costs can be surprisingly opaque, especially when NAT Gateways are involved. For many AWS users, the most noticeable expense isn’t the hourly charge for running a NAT Gateway, but the data processing charges applied to traffic that flows through the gateway. In private subnets, resources such as EC2 instances, managed services, or build/deploy pipelines may need to reach the internet for a variety of reasons—software updates, package downloads, or access to AWS services that aren’t fully covered by a private endpoint strategy. When these flows pass through a NAT Gateway, AWS bills them based on the amount of data processed, which can accumulate quickly and lead to unexpectedly high monthly invoices.

To put the problem in perspective: traffic to services like Amazon S3, software repositories, or OS update servers can be substantial even if the number of outbound connections is modest. Because NAT Gateways translate and route that traffic, each byte of data sent or received through the gateway incurs a processing charge. In contrast, the cost of keeping a NAT Gateway running for hourly uptime may be less impactful than the corresponding data processing charges for heavy data egress or ingress through the gateway. The net effect is that data-heavy operations from private subnets drive the bulk of NAT Gateway costs.

The good news is that there are well-established patterns to significantly reduce this expense. The central strategy is to minimize or eliminate the reliance on NAT Gateway for internet-bound traffic by using AWS-native alternatives designed for private connectivity. Specifically, this involves routing traffic through Gateway Endpoints for AWS services, or through Interface Endpoints (powered by PrivateLink) for other services. With these approaches, traffic can stay within the AWS network, avoiding NAT processing charges and, in many cases, reducing data transfer costs as well. The changes can be implemented with varying degrees of architectural impact, from relatively straightforward endpoint enablement to more comprehensive network redesigns, depending on current architecture and security requirements.

The deeper dive into the concepts reveals a few key patterns:
– Free Gateway Endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB: AWS provides Gateway Endpoints that allow private subnets to access S3 and DynamoDB without traversing a NAT Gateway or the public internet. These endpoints are typically free of data processing charges, making them a powerful tool for cost optimization when your workloads frequently access S3 or DynamoDB.
– Interface Endpoints for other AWS services: For services beyond S3 and DynamoDB, Interface Endpoints (PrivateLink) provide private connectivity directly to service endpoints from within your VPC. While there is a per-ENI hourly charge and data processing fees, this model can still be cheaper than NAT data processing costs for certain traffic patterns, and it reduces exposure to the public internet.
– Architectural considerations: If you rely on outbound internet access for software updates, package management, or other external connections, you can reduce costs by consolidating those flows through managed proxies, or by eliminating unnecessary outbound access altogether. This can be achieved through a combination of endpoint usage, proxy services, and stricter egress controls, coupled with automated maintenance and caching where appropriate.

The overall takeaway is that cost optimization isn’t just about reducing the hourly NAT rate; it’s about rethinking how traffic exits the private subnet. By routing to S3 and DynamoDB through Gateway Endpoints and to other AWS services via Interface Endpoints, you can significantly cut data processing charges and lower your total NAT-related bill. For workloads that must reach the open internet, consider controlled outbound access models, such as managed proxies, to centralize and optimize data flows, apply caching, and monitor data transfer patterns.

In-Depth Analysis¶

NAT Gateways are designed to provide outbound internet connectivity for private subnets without exposing those subnets directly to the internet. AWS pricing for NAT Gateways is twofold: an hourly rate and a data processing rate. While it’s tempting to focus on the hourly cost, the data processing charges are frequently the primary driver of total cost, particularly for workloads with substantial data transfer. This is especially true for workloads performing large-scale S3 data transfers, software updates, or continuous package downloads from private subnets.

Consider a typical use case: a web service running in private subnets frequently performs software updates or pulls dependencies from public repositories or S3. Each time a file is downloaded or upload occurs through the NAT Gateway, AWS applies a data processing charge based on the volume of bytes processed. In high-traffic scenarios, these charges accumulate quickly, outpacing what users might expect from the hourly NAT Gateway rate alone. The implications are clear: even with modest traffic in terms of connection count, high data volumes can lead to a sizable bill.

To counter this, AWS provides a set of networking options designed to keep traffic off the NAT Gateway or reduce the cost per byte. The most impactful option is the Gateway VPC Endpoint for S3, which allows private subnets to access S3 without traversing the NAT Gateway or the open internet. There is no data processing charge for Vault Gateway Endpoints to S3 (as per current AWS pricing; always verify regional specifics). DynamoDB has a similar Gateway Endpoint mechanism. These endpoints route traffic directly within the AWS network, avoiding NAT processing charges altogether for S3 and DynamoDB requests.

For other AWS services, Interface Endpoints (PrivateLink) enable private connectivity from your VPC to a service without exposing traffic to the public internet or traversing a NAT Gateway for that service. Interface Endpoints create endpoint network interfaces within your VPC subnets that connect to service-powered endpoints. While there are per-hour per-endpoint costs and data processing charges for data traversing the endpoint interface, many scenarios result in a lower total cost and reduced exposure to internet-based threats and variability. This approach is particularly attractive when your workloads require frequent calls to services that are not covered by Gateway Endpoints.

In addition to these endpoint solutions, architectural changes can further reduce NAT-related costs. A common strategy is to deploy managed proxy solutions to centralize and control outbound traffic. Proxies can cache frequently requested resources, aggregate or throttle data, and compress payloads, all of which help reduce the amount of data that must pass through NAT Gateways. Proxies can also improve security posture by consolidating egress controls and enabling standardized authentication and auditing. Depending on requirements, an organization may choose a fully managed proxy service, or an internally managed proxy with careful operational discipline.

Eliminating unnecessary outbound internet access is another important tactic. If certain components or services do not strictly require internet access, they should be restricted from outbound traffic. This reduces the effective data transfer that would otherwise be routed through the NAT Gateway, lowering both data processing charges and the probability of unexpected traffic spikes. When outbound internet access is necessary, routing through private endpoints or controlled proxies helps ensure predictable cost and performance.

There are practical steps to implement these patterns with minimal disruption:
– Inventory traffic patterns: Identify which workloads frequently access S3, DynamoDB, or other AWS services from private subnets. Determine the proportion of traffic that would benefit from Gateway Endpoints versus Interface Endpoints.
– Enable Gateway Endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB: Create and configure Gateway Endpoints in the VPC, making sure route tables in private subnets are updated to direct S3 and DynamoDB traffic to the endpoints.
– Implement Interface Endpoints for other services: For services not covered by Gateway Endpoints, deploy Interface Endpoints where feasible and update application configurations to point to the private endpoints.
– Consider proxies for broader egress: If outbound web access is required, evaluate managed proxy services or centralized caching/proxy solutions to reduce data transfer and improve security.
– Monitor and optimize: Use AWS Cost Explorer, VPC flow logs, and traffic analysis to validate savings and adjust configurations as usage evolves.

It’s important to note that, while Endpoint-based connectivity tends to lower data processing charges, it’s not a universal cure. Some services may incur costs differently, and there can be trade-offs in performance, complexity, and maintenance. For instance, Interface Endpoints add a per-hour cost per endpoint and data processing charges for traffic across the endpoint interface. Organizations should model their expected traffic and costs in their own environment to determine the most cost-effective configuration. A phased approach—starting with the most expensive or data-heavy flows—can help validate savings before broad-reaching changes.

*圖片來源：Unsplash*

From a security perspective, shifting traffic onto private endpoints can also improve the security posture by reducing exposure to the public internet and enabling more granular access controls. However, it’s essential to review IAM policies, endpoint policies, and security groups to ensure that the new architecture aligns with organizational security requirements. Logging and monitoring should be enhanced to capture traffic through endpoints, including successful and failed requests, to support incident response and cost governance.

In summarizing the economic dynamics, the NAT Gateway cost model is dominated by data processing charges in many real-world deployments. By moving traffic to Gateway Endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB and using Interface Endpoints for other AWS services, teams can often realize meaningful reductions in data processing costs. When combined with architectural changes such as managed proxies and stricter egress controls, the total cost of ownership for outbound internet access can be substantially improved, without sacrificing functionality or security.

Perspectives and Impact¶

The broader implications of this cost optimization strategy extend beyond a single project or organization. As AWS customers scale their environments, small per-byte differences in data processing charges accumulate into significant annual savings. Companies that routinely perform large-scale deployments, continuous integration pipelines, or data ingestion workflows from private subnets stand to benefit the most from re-architecting their networking approach.

The move toward more private, endpoint-based connectivity is also aligned with broader cloud security and governance trends. Private connectivity reduces exposure to the public internet, simplifies auditability, and enables more predictable cost models. However, the shift requires careful planning, including understanding service-specific pricing, ensuring compatibility with existing tooling, and validating performance under real workloads.

Operational teams should prepare for changes in deployment and maintenance processes. Endpoint-based architectures may require updates to CI/CD pipelines, configuration management, and monitoring dashboards. Teams may also need to invest in training for network administrators and developers to understand the new connectivity patterns and troubleshoot endpoint-related issues.

Future pricing dynamics will influence how aggressively organizations pursue endpoint-based architectures. AWS pricing evolves, and regional differences can shift the cost-benefit analysis. It remains important to perform regular cost reviews, simulate worst-case traffic, and re-evaluate architectural decisions as business needs change. As customers gain more experience with Gateway Endpoints and PrivateLink, best practices will emerge, helping teams optimize both cost and reliability.

Key Takeaways¶

Main Points:
– Data processing charges on NAT Gateway can be the primary driver of cost, not just the hourly rate.
– Gateway Endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB provide data-free (or data-minimized) access from private subnets.
– Interface Endpoints (PrivateLink) offer private connectivity to many AWS services with different cost trade-offs.
– Architectural changes, including managed proxies and reduced outbound internet exposure, can offer substantial savings.

Areas of Concern:
– Not all services have straightforward Gateway Endpoint options; some require Interface Endpoints with associated costs.
– Endpoint-based connectivity may introduce configuration complexity and maintenance needs.
– Regional pricing variations can affect the overall savings, so calculations must be location-aware.

Summary and Recommendations¶

To manage NAT Gateway expenses effectively, re-architect how private subnets access AWS services and the internet. Begin by enabling Gateway Endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB to bypass NAT data processing for frequent S3/DynamoDB access. For other AWS services, deploy Interface Endpoints where suitable, weighing the per-endpoint and data processing costs against NAT data charges. Where outbound internet access remains necessary, consider centralized, managed proxies to control and optimize traffic, potentially enabling caching and compression to reduce data volumes. Finally, reduce or eliminate outbound internet access where possible and monitor traffic to ensure that the cost reductions are realized without compromising performance, reliability, or security.

A phased approach is advisable:
– Phase 1: Identify the most data-heavy flows (e.g., S3 pulls, OS updates) and migrate to Gateway Endpoints.
– Phase 2: Add Interface Endpoints for essential services not covered by Gateway Endpoints.
– Phase 3: Introduce controlled outbound access through proxies for remaining needs.
– Phase 4: Continuously monitor costs and adjust endpoint configurations as usage changes.

With careful planning and execution, NAT Gateway-related costs can be significantly reduced, turning a surprising expense into a predictable and manageable line item.

References
– Original: https://dev.to/techresolve/solved-why-nat-gateway-is-so-expensive-522o
– AWS Documentation on VPC Endpoints: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/vpc-endpoints.html
– AWS PrivateLink and Interface Endpoints: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/endpoint-services.html

Forbidden:
– No thinking process or “Thinking…” markers
– Article starts with “## TLDR”

*圖片來源：Unsplash*