TLDR¶

• Core Features: Preloads File Explorer into system memory at startup to improve responsiveness (through Preview Build 26220.7271 / KB5070307).
• Main Advantages: Faster launch behavior by preloading, potential reductions in cold-start delays.
• User Experience: Still exhibits sluggishness in some operations despite memory boost.
• Considerations: Increased RAM usage without a comprehensive fix; ongoing performance bottlenecks may persist.
• Purchase Recommendation: Not a product purchase decision, but a cautious note: expect incremental gains rather than a complete speed overhaul.

Product Specifications & Ratings¶

Overall Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.9/5.0)

Product Overview¶

Microsoft’s ongoing challenge with Windows 11’s File Explorer has centered on persistent performance complaints. In response, the company introduced a workaround-like improvement as part of Preview Build 26220.7271, delivered under the KB5070307 update. The core idea is straightforward: preemptively preload the File Explorer process into system memory at every startup. By keeping critical components resident in memory, the system aims to shorten subsequent launch times and reduce the perceived “warm-up” delay that users experience when opening folders or performing file operations.

From a practical standpoint, this means Windows 11 is attempting to optimize the user path for common actions such as opening a folder, navigating to a path, or switching between directories. The move aligns with a broader performance strategy observed in modern operating systems where frequently accessed subsystems are kept readily available in RAM to mitigate latency. In theory, this should translate into snappier responses, particularly on systems with ample memory where preloading incurs minimal trade-offs in terms of available resources for other tasks.

However, the update represents a targeted workaround rather than a foundational fix to File Explorer’s architectural performance issues. While some users report noticeable improvements in initial interactions and quicker render times for directories with fewer items, the overall experience may still reveal lingering delays in more complex scenarios. For example, folders containing large numbers of files, network paths, or certain shell extensions can still trigger perceptible lag, and memory pressure from other applications can influence Explorer’s responsiveness. The net effect is a pragmatic enhancement: a faster-feeling Explorer on certain workloads, paired with a reminder that deeper, systemic optimizations may still be required to address all performance bottlenecks comprehensively.

In terms of scope, this change fits alongside other iterative Windows 11 refinements focused on user experience without requiring a broader platform overhaul. It underscores Microsoft’s incremental approach: identify user pain points, apply focused mitigations, and monitor feedback before pursuing more extensive architectural changes. For IT administrators and everyday users alike, the change offers an additional lever to optimize performance on devices with sufficient RAM, while highlighting that the underlying Explorer latency remains an area of active concern and optimization.

Overall, the update signals progress in improving daily usability for Windows 11 File Explorer, but it also makes clear that a complete, definitive performance cure remains elusive. The shift to a memory-first strategy reflects a pragmatic defense against frequent user friction, yet the continued presence of slowdowns in certain scenarios suggests that further work—potentially including UI thread optimizations, indexing behavior, and shell integration—will be needed to deliver a truly consistently fast File Explorer experience.

In-Depth Review¶

The revamped approach to File Explorer performance in Windows 11 centers on preloading: at system startup, Windows allocates memory to keep core Explorer components resident, reducing the cold-start penalty that users experience when launching the app. This strategy leverages the relationship between available RAM and perceived speed. By ensuring that the key processes behind File Explorer have a head start in memory, users may see quicker responses when opening folders, switching views, or invoking common commands.

From a technical standpoint, the concept is not new but is applied here as a targeted optimization. Rather than overhauling the file-browsing engine or rearchitecting shell integrations, Microsoft opted for a method that reduces the latency of initial user actions. The practical result for many users is a more responsive first interaction with Explorer after boot. The improvement is especially noticeable on devices with large amounts of free memory where the operating system can afford to reserve resources for Explorer without impacting overall system performance.

That said, the strategy does not eliminate all forms of latency. File Explorer remains sensitive to several variables that can influence speed, including:
– Directory depth and complexity: Folders with a deeply nested structure can still require multiple UI refreshes and metadata lookups.
– File counts: Large directories can strain the rendering pipeline, indexing, and thumbnail extraction, which can reintroduce delays during listing or refresh operations.
– Network locations and external sources: Accessing remote shares or slow storage adds I/O latency that memory preloading cannot fully mitigate.
– Shell extensions and third-party plugins: Add-ons can impact responsiveness, especially if they perform their own I/O or processing in tandem with Explorer.
– System resource pressure: When RAM is constrained or CPU usage is high due to foreground tasks, preloading benefits can be diminished as the system negotiates resource allocation.

In practice, some users report that the preloading approach yields a tangible bump in perceived speed for routine tasks, while others notice little to no improvement in more demanding workflows. The mixed feedback underscores that this is a partial remedy rather than a comprehensive performance overhaul. It is a useful reminder that user experience in Windows 11 File Explorer is shaped by a constellation of subsystems operating in concert, and a single adjustment—no matter how well-executed—may not homogenize performance across all scenarios.

From a usability perspective, the change is welcomed because it reduces the friction of initial interactions. If there is a noticeable improvement when opening a directory or switching between views, it directly translates to a smoother onboarding experience for day-to-day file management. However, users should calibrate expectations: the update is not a guarantee of universal speed gains, and the degree of improvement will vary based on hardware configuration, workload, and environmental factors.

Benchmarking these kinds of optimizations can be challenging due to the variability in real-world usage. Synthetic tests may show modest gains in cold-start timings, while real-world sessions—comprising file operations, thumbnail loading, and folder navigation—may reveal a spectrum of performance outcomes. In short, the improvement is situational and dependent on how memory-rich a given system is and what tasks users are performing when Explorer is invoked.

From a software quality perspective, the approach demonstrates an iterative tuning mindset: listen to user pain points, implement a non-disruptive modification, and iterate based on feedback. It aligns with the broader Windows 11 cadence of incremental refinements intended to deliver a more polished experience without destabilizing existing workflows. For organizations deploying Windows 11 across fleets of devices, this kind of update can offer incremental value, particularly on devices with modern CPUs and ample RAM. It’s a reminder that even well-optimized systems can benefit from micro-optimizations in popular components like File Explorer.

*圖片來源：Unsplash*

In terms of future direction, this strategy could be complemented by deeper foundational work on Explorer’s architecture, such as optimizing UI thread management, improving thumbnail and metadata caching strategies, refining indexing behavior, or addressing bottlenecks in the shell integration chain. If Microsoft pursues a more comprehensive solution, we might expect additional refinements that aim to flatten latency across a wider range of operations and datasets, beyond initial startup responsiveness. For now, the memory-preload tactic stands as a practical, non-disruptive improvement that can help reduce the initial perceived delay while maintaining system stability and compatibility.

In conclusion, Windows 11’s updated File Explorer with the startup memory preload presents a thoughtful, user-centric workaround for a long-standing performance grievance. It offers a measurable, if not universal, speed-up in typical daily usage. Yet it also underscores the nuanced reality that speed in a complex OS component depends on a matrix of factors, and a single fix—however well-executed—may not fully eradicate the middle- and long-tail delays users encounter. The update is a meaningful step forward in the ongoing optimization of File Explorer, signaling that Microsoft is attentive to performance fidelity while continuing to pursue deeper efficiencies in future iterations.

Real-World Experience¶

In real-world usage, the impact of the preview update can vary significantly depending on the hardware and the tasks at hand. On machines with ample RAM, the system’s preloading strategy tends to yield a smoother initial interaction with File Explorer. Users who routinely open folders immediately after boot—such as power users who launch Explorer multiple times in a session—may notice shorter warm-up periods and more immediate responsiveness when navigating to common locations like This PC, Documents, or Downloads.

During daily usage, Explorer’s behavior remains a balance of caching, rendering, and I/O. When browsing directories with moderate item counts (dozens to a few hundred files), listing operations, icon generation, and column reordering typically render quickly, with the memory preload contributing additional headroom for snappy transitions. In scenarios involving directories with tens of thousands of items, or when performing operations that trigger extensive metadata reads (e.g., sorting by date or size while thumbnails are being generated), the UI can still lag momentarily. This lag is often attributable to the cumulative cost of rendering large results, generating thumbnails, and updating the view, rather than a simple absence of preloaded components.

Network and external storage also play a critical role. Accessing files over a slow network share or an external drive with limited throughput can dominate the time spent on an operation, eclipsing any gains from preloading. In such cases, even a preloaded Explorer remains bound by the speed of the underlying storage and network stack. Users may find that the update offers less relief in these contexts but can still feel some benefit when opening local folders that would otherwise require a more substantial initialization.

On systems under memory pressure, the preload strategy’s advantages diminish. If other applications consume a large portion of RAM, Windows must reclaim memory, potentially pruning the Explorer cache and negating some of the intended speed-ups. In this environment, users might observe that Explorer’s responsiveness reverts to prior levels once memory pressure increases, underscoring the trade-off between keeping components resident and preserving headroom for foreground tasks.

From a usability perspective, the update does not add user-facing controls or settings; it operates transparently in the background. This makes it easy to adopt for most users, who benefit from faster startup without needing to tweak configurations. However, IT professionals managing devices across organizations may want to consider monitoring memory utilization and ensuring that devices have sufficient RAM to accommodate this behavior without compromising other workloads.

In short, the real-world experience confirms that the update delivers tangible benefits for many users while also highlighting the limitations inherent to a partial optimization strategy. It’s a practical improvement for typical day-to-day file management, particularly on modern hardware, but not a universal panacea for all Explorer-related performance concerns.

Pros and Cons Analysis¶

Pros:
– Faster initial responsiveness of File Explorer due to memory preloading
– Simple, low-risk update with no user-facing configuration required
– Benefits are more pronounced on devices with ample RAM
– Part of an ongoing, non-disruptive optimization strategy for Windows 11

Cons:
– Not a comprehensive fix for all Explorer performance issues
– Benefits vary by workload, directory size, and storage speed
– Reduced gains under memory pressure or on slower storage networks
– Still an area of active optimization; future updates may alter behavior

Purchase Recommendation¶

This update is best viewed as a pragmatic quality-of-life improvement rather than a fundamental performance overhaul. For everyday users, it offers a smoother initial experience with File Explorer, particularly on modern devices boasting ample RAM. If you frequently interact with File Explorer shortly after boot or routinely perform quick navigations across standard folders, you may notice a tangible improvement in perceived speed.

However, it’s important to set realistic expectations. The patch does not remove all latency associated with Explorer, especially in high-load scenarios such as browsing directories with vast numbers of files, dealing with remote shares, or performing I/O-intensive operations. For organizations evaluating Windows 11 deployments, this change represents a low-risk enhancement that can contribute to smoother daily usage, but it should be considered alongside other performance tuning efforts and hardware capabilities.

For end users considering whether to upgrade, this is not a purchase decision in itself. It’s a software update that improves a component of the Windows experience. The efficacy of the change will largely depend on the device’s hardware profile and typical usage patterns. If speed is a critical factor for your workflow and you’re operating on a machine with plenty of memory, you’re more likely to experience the benefits. If your setup already struggles with memory availability or involves heavy network storage usage, the impact may be more modest.

In conclusion, the memory-preload approach adopted by the Windows 11 File Explorer update represents a measured, user-centric improvement. It demonstrates Microsoft’s commitment to addressing real-world usability concerns with targeted, non-disruptive changes. While not a complete fix, the enhancement contributes to a more responsive file-management experience on compatible hardware, and it lays a foundation for subsequent optimizations that could tackle deeper architectural bottlenecks in File Explorer.

References¶

• Original Article – Source: https://www.techspot.com/news/110446-windows-11-updated-file-explorer-remains-painfully-slow.html
• Supabase Documentation
• Deno Official Site
• Supabase Edge Functions
• React Documentation

*圖片來源：Unsplash*